Categories
Victims

Amaia Zabarte, 05.03.2024. Hit in the back of the head – San Sebastián

March 5, 2024 – near the Anoeta stadium – San Sebastián
44 year-old. Struck by foam ball to the head, then being kicked by an Ertzaintza (Basque police) officer : neurological damage

n March 5th, when, before the Champions League match between Real Sociedad and Paris Saint-Germain, Amaia Zabarte was struck in an unjustified police charge by the Ertzaintza (Basque Police) near the Anoeta stadium. She attended the match as just another Real Sociedad fan, with her husband and nine-year-old son. She was admitted to the ICU at Donostia Hospital after being hit in the back of the head during clashes 

On a  a 41-second video showing Amaia  can be seen falling to the ground after being struck by something heavy, and then being kicked by an Ertzaintza (Basque police) officer. It provides insight into what Amaia did. As her husband, Joseba Novoa, stated on SER DEPORTIVOS GIPUZKOA radio

She didn’t act recklessly, nor was she unconscious; she wasn’t to blame for what happened to her,” contrary to what they’ve been led to believe. “It’s social justice for Amaia, for my wife. I said I wouldn’t stop until we clarified what happened, and now with these images, we see what happened, and now everyone can draw their own conclusions”. From now on, “the evidence speaks for itself,” and they hope that the justice system will take action, “open proceedings, and summon the parties involved to testify.

“18 months since they almost killed” his wife “in front of dozens of Ertzaintza officers, barely 20 meters away ,” and that “to this day, the Ertzaintza has not brought the perpetrator before a judge.”

” The investigation is not just disastrous, it’s beyond disastrous . To this day, the investigating judge has not taken a statement from any Ertzaintza officer, and she won’t until November,” 

“How can it be that in front of dozens of Ertzaintza officers they almost killed my wife and they still haven’t found the perpetrator? What do they think society is going to think? That the Ertzaintza is a completely incompetent force, or that they clearly know who the perpetrator is and don’t want to reveal him?”

The case prompted an internal investigation by the Ertzaintza (Basque Police) and the release of a video of the incident , leading the EH Bildu and Sumar groups to demand in the Basque Parliament that those responsible for the incident be held accountable.

In parallel, the Court of Instruction number 4 of San Sebastián opened an investigation into the matter for public disorder, although it provisionally dismissed it shortly afterwards due to the absence of a known perpetrator.

This dismissal was appealed by the victim’s family to the Third Section of the Gipuzkoa Provincial Court, which decided to revoke the provisional dismissal of the case and ordered the investigating court to carry out new investigative procedures, including taking a statement from the victim , which took place on April 7.

Several Ertzaintza officers have begun testifying in San Sebastián (Gipuzkoa) on charges related to the incidents that occurred around the Reale Arena stadium before the Real Sociedad-PSG football match. The case had to be reopened by order of the Gipuzkoa Provincial Court, and the San Sebastián judge needed twenty months to summon the officers to testify. They began appearing in court this Tuesday. The Public Prosecutor’s Office did not even appear, so any requests for conviction will be left to the private plaintiffs.

As has happened in many other Ertzaintza attacks, the judge tried to close the case as quickly as possible, without even hearing from the victims, but the Gipuzkoa Provincial Court forced him to reopen the case this time.

The police version

According to the newspaper Gara, the first officer to testify was the one in command of the three Ertzaintza vans on March 5, 2024. According to Amaia”s lawyer, that officer denied what seemed indisputable: he said that “they hadn’t fired foam projectiles” and that “he didn’t see any officer kick Zabarte,” despite video evidence to the contrary.

The police officer who kicked Amaia while she was on the ground defended his actions in April, claiming she had “tripped.” He maintained this same version in his statement on Tuesday. Furthermore, the aforementioned Ertzaintza commander suggested to the judge that Amaia “fell to the ground the first time because a stone hit her,” despite the fact that, as Gara points out , the footage shows her falling to the ground because of something thrown from where the Ertzaintza were positioned.

The recordings show no altercation before the Ertzaintza’s charge, but even so, the police have maintained their version: that they supposedly “suffered attacks” that afternoon and that is why they charged at the people. However, they have not proven this claim at all. One of the officers, in giving his testimony, explained that there was no disturbance until 10 minutes before the charge, because the match was about to start.

Physical violence
 Arrest
 Detention / Custody
 XHustle / Projection
 Prone position / lying flat on the stomach / ventral decubitus
 Folding” (holding a person in a seated position with their head resting on their knees)
 Painful armlock
 XKicks, punches, slaps
 Feet / knees on the nape of the neck, chest or face
 Blows to the victim while under control and/or on the ground
 Blows to the ears
 Strangulation / chokehold
 Fingers forced backwards
 Spraying with water
 Dog bites
 Hair pulling
 Painful tightening of colson ties or handcuffs
 Painfully pulling by colson ties or handcuffs
 Sexual abuse
 Striking with a police vehicle
 Electric shocks
 Use of gloves
 Use of firearm
 Use of “Bean bags” (a coton sack containing tiny lead bullets)
 Use of FlashBall weapon
 Use of sound grenade
 Use of dispersal grenade
 Use of teargas grenade
 Use of rubber bullets weapon (LBD40 type)
XUse of batons
 Use of Pepper Spray
 Use of Taser gun
 Use of tranquillisers
 Torture / Inhumane and degrading treatment
 Execution
 Kidnapping
 Disappearance
Psychological violence
 Charge of disturbing public order
 Charge of rebellion
 Accusation of beatings to officer
 Charge of threatening officer
 Charge of insulting an officer
 Charge of disrespect
 Charge of resisting arrest
 Aggressive behaviour, disrespect, insults
 Intimidation, blackmail, threats
 Vexing or intimidating identity check
 Mock execution
 Intimidation or arrest of witnesses
 Prevented from taking photographs or from filming the scene
 Calls to end torment remained unheeded
 Prolonged uncomfortable position
 Failure to assist a person in danger
 Photographs, fingerprints, DNA
 Threat with a weapon
 Shooting in the back
 Charging without warning
 Kettling (corraling protestors to isolate them from the rest of the demonstration)
 Car chase
 Sexist remarks
 Homophobic remarks
 Racist comments
 Intervention in a private place
 At the police station
 Mental health issues
 Harassment
 Body search
 Home search
 Violence by fellow police officers
 Passivity of police colleagues
 Lack or refusal of the police officer to identify him or herself
 Refusal to notify someone or to telephone
 Refusal to administer a breathalyzer
 Refusal to fasten the seatbelt during transport
 Refusal to file a complaint
 Refusal to allow medical care or medication
 Lies, cover-ups, disappearance of evidence
 Undress before witnesses of the opposite sex
 Bend down naked in front of witnesses
 Lack of surveillance or monitoring during detention
 Lack of signature in the Personal Effects Register during detention
 Deprivation during detention (water, food)
 Inappropriate sanitary conditions during detention (temperature, hygiene, light)
 Sleep deprivation
 Confiscation, deterioration, destruction of personal effects
 Pressure to sign documents
 Absence of a report
 Complacency of doctors
  • 00.04.2025 – Testimony of Amaia and police officers before the judge
  • 05.03.2024 – Agression of Amaia
  • Lawyer :
  • Collective :
  • Donations :